Should criminal barristers be allowed to strike?

Criminal barristers had been offered a 15% pay rise by the government, “but this will not be made effective immediately and will only apply to new cases, not those in the backlog”, said The Mirror, adding that “it fails to wipe out years of cuts”.

It falls well short of the 25% rise in pay for legal aid work called for by the CBA.

‘Wholly unjustified’

Justice minister Sarah Dines said the decision by barristers was “irresponsible” and “wholly unjustified considering we are increasing criminal barristers’ fees by 15%, which will see the typical barrister earn around £7,000 more a year”.

In The Telegraph former justice minister James Cartlidge went further. “If you have an organisation seemingly intent on indefinite strike action, no matter the cost to wider society, with demands that no government could acquiesce to,” he said, the only option left is “to rapidly recruit a Crown Defence Service to mirror the [Crown Prosecution Service], with lawyers who would have the security of a permanent post and, in return, the government of the day would have the certainty that it could keep the courts running.”

Yet, in the midst of a cost-of-living crisis and stagnant wages, there is sympathy for a group “not usually known as being a militant workforce”, said the Manchester Evening News.

Criminal barrister Adam King, writing for UnHerd, said that “on the surface, yes, it’s about money”. Barristers face “banker hours and teacher stress”, he said.

But what is clear is that “unlike teachers, train drivers, or even doctors” barristers participating in the walkouts “are risking serious professional disciplinary sanction. Strength of feeling is not an infallible guide to the merits of an argument of course, but here they do coincide. And these are actions, not words – actions that have never been taken before. I cannot see the Bar backing down.”

Impact on the courts

The walkout, which is set to coincide with the announcement of a new Tory leader and prime minister on 5 September, “will result in the vast majority of crown court trials in England and Wales being adjourned, while others could collapse entirely”, said The Guardian.

During the first 19 days of industrial action this summer, there were 6,235 court cases disrupted, including 1,415 trials, across England and Wales, said the paper.

The Mirror said the walkout will “worsen the 60,000 backlog in court cases”, but “if this industrial action ends in the government acceding to their demands, barristers will see it as a necessary evil”, argued the Manchester Evening News.

“Criminal barristers are incredibly angry,” said Casciani, “and it’s very hard to see how this stand-off can be resolved any time soon.”

Article source: https://www.theweek.co.uk/news/law/957730/should-criminal-barristers-be-allowed-to-strike